COVID Testing: We’ve Been Duped – Global Research

Lost in this whole pandemic hysteria are some key considerations that when carefully analyzed place the whole COVID-19 narrative in a highly questionable light.  The gatekeepers of information dissimulation are manufacturing consent at an alarming rate, but their fatigue is setting in, and their masks are falling off.  What better, albeit unlikely, source to go for some much needed illumination than the New York Times

During a considerably quieter time, back in 2007, the New York Times featured a very interesting exposé on molecular diagnostic testing — specifically, the inadequacy of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test in achieving reliable results.  The most significant concern highlighted in the Times report is how molecular tests, most notably the PCR, are highly sensitive and prone to false positives.  At the center of the controversy was a potential outbreak in a hospital in New Hampshire that proved to be nothing more than “ordinary respiratory diseases like the common cold.”  Unfortunately, the results wrought by the PCR told a different story.

Thankfully, a faux epidemic was avoided but not before thousands of workers were furloughed and given antibiotics and ultimately a vaccine, and hospital beds (including some in intensive care) were taken out of commission.  Eight months later, what was thought to be an epidemic was deemed a non-malicious hoax.  The culprit?  According to “epidemiologists and infectious disease specialists … too much faith in a quick and highly sensitive molecular test .. led them astray.”  At the time, such tests were “coming into increasing use” as maybe “the only way to get a quick answer in diagnosing diseases like … SARS, and deciding whether an epidemic is under way.”

Nevertheless, today, the PCR test is considered the gold standard of molecular diagnostics, most notably in the diagnosis of COVID-19.  However, a closer analysis reveals that the PCR has actually been pretty spotty and that false positives abound.

Personally, I think the science is just about settled on COVID-19.  The conclusion?  We’ve been duped!

COVID Testing: We’ve Been Duped

Published by TCTTNews

Sharing real news, information & analysis.

5 thoughts on “COVID Testing: We’ve Been Duped – Global Research

  1. Yes, agent provocateurs are common tools to justify police violence. In Krautistan they are used to divide peaceful protesters against the lock downs. This video debunks how they use false-flag psyops attacks via MSM…

    The voice over is in german language only, but auto-translated YT subtitles works very well.

    Thank You for the WW3 Scenario recommendation! I’ll order it when book shops are open again.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Excellent observational skills from the man in that video. In my opinion it is the MSM that are the biggest enemy of the people in our time, even more so than the corrupt governments, without an honest media informing people of the truth the corrupt governments & their puppet masters can get away with all sorts of evil. Thanks for sharing the video.

      Liked by 1 person

      1. i can’t agree more! to have a working democracy the whole Truth is required, not 50%. even 95% truth isn’t good enough to prevent the autocracy of oligarch.
        Thank YOU! for your dedication to publish the Truth for the people, not against them.

        Liked by 1 person

  2. Those global lock downs aren’t designed to contain a pandemic of the corona virus, but they work perfectly to keep protester like the PEACE movement, XR, Gilets Jaunes, and BLM out of the streets. Obviously, those lock downs protect the status quo for oligarchs & capitalists against the solidarity of peoples.

    Thank You! for publishing GlobalResearch reports. 2003 the award-winning author Michel Chossudovsky debunked the evil NWO in his book Globalization of Poverty.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yes the lockdowns are very effective at keeping protests off the streets, although i would caution that many protest groups & individuals within those groups are bought & paid for by the establishment itself & are often used to foment violence which then allows the establishment to justify police violence & MSM propaganda narratives against the authentic protesters, it is often worth checking who is funding the protest groups.
      Although i do not agree with many of the articles that Global Research publish they are a very valuable resource, i would also recommend Michel Chossudovsky’s books Towards A WW3 Scenario & The Globalization of War, very interesting reads.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: